Consonant used in a sentence

Consonant in a sentence as a noun

In Chinese, all single digit number has the same structure: a consonant plus a vowel.

Most glyphs tend to be consonants, though some are vowels, and others can be special marks for indicating tone or other notions.

"I'm a fan of any celebrity whose name is short and contains a convenient vowel-consonant pattern.

Syllables are formed by a logical and consistent system of vowel signs that can be attached to consonant characters3.

The real issue is that Korean has those tense consonants whose specific manner of articulation doesn't exist in any other language.

This also happens with consonants, Korean has a "stressed" consonant system that non-Korean speakers literally can't hear because a "k" and a "k" with a stress end up int the same phonological slot.

Consonant in a sentence as an adjective

For example, the distinction between "I speak" and "he speaks" in English involves a consonant cluster at the end of a syllable, and no such consonant clusters exist in the Mandarin sound system at all.

Well, I'm sure that Sanskrit and its descendants are awesome languages, but your claim that "sanskrit alphabets encompasses almost every possible consonant and vowel sounds that a human can generate" is just bollocks.

Japanese happens to have sounds for both /f/ and /p/ unlike Korean, but not for /f/ and /h/. So youll hear Japanese speakers of English having a hard time producing those two sounds distinctly just like Korean speakers have a hard time with /f/ and /p/.The Korean consonantal distinctions are particular tricky, though, because its one consonant in English being not two sounds in Korean but three.

The only attitude consonant \n to our search for a comfortable, safe life is to constrain \n ourselves to our own limitations, ignore the intelligent \n life out there, and surrender to the mediocracy that our \n society has condemned our leisure time to.\n\nSide note: these problems might relate to the fields chauvinism problem.

Word order is identical in many sentences, both use particles or postpositions to mark the function of nouns, both use topics instead of subjects, both allow you to omit the topic if it can be inferred through context, both have a respect hierarchy built into the grammar, both have tons of pronouns and related categories of family words, both have the adversative passive of Chinese, both are agglutinative in the sense that they allow you to add a noun after a verb phrase to form a relative clause that modifies the noun, both have lots of similarly-pronounced Chinese-derived open class words, both have the rare alveolo-palatal fricatives and affricates in their sound inventories as is found in Mandarin, both make the /h/ consonant a voiceless palatal fricative before [i] or [j], etc.