conceptualisation

The sums are fairly easy, it's the conceptualisation that's hard.

There will always be some new use case or better conceptualisation that you didn't think of and, really, all you're doing much of the time is thrashing by pursuing this.

Worse, we've build a conceptualisation of these phenomena that renders us as calculators on steroids!

Is "good" a matter of morality?Can there be a conceptualisation of "good" independent of morality?How or how not?

I see some attempt by using coloured lines but there should be a way to make these ideas hierchical and from that be able to zoom up and down various levels of conceptualisation.

This seams a lot more likely than the idea that we need to revise our entire conceptualisation of memory formation to suit a psychological theory.

A good polyglot has detached their language facility from their conceptualisation faculties.

All this high level stuff like conceptualisation and visualisation relies on subjective self-reporting.

"Collapsing" is just a convenient shortcut for calculation/conceptualisation purposes but never actually happens IRL.

No accountant, or any other form of number cruncher was involved in the conceptualisation, implementation, or evolution of the spreadsheet.

"how do you explain how you have an original idea, or learn something you previously had no conceptualisation of"This is like "where does your chess intuition come from" - and what I'm trying to express is that my chess intuition isn't actually a black box. There is a set of heuristics which I follow in order to come up with these "original ideas".

However, I don't see how this establishes lisp as having, "very fundamental differences in thinking and conceptualisation that are difficult or impossible to 'just' teach over".

It's a narrow conceptualisation, but it goes hand in hand with the capabilities to create technologies that significantly modify the environment in favour of the members of the culture doing the city building.

And certainly to me, doesn't justify the catchy "assumption-challenging" title of the paper, which appeals to an obviously informal definition of the term.===In our work, we proceed from a theoretical conceptualisation of wisdom as expert-level knowledge and judgement in the fundamental pragmatics of life.