burgle

"Murgle burgle burgle wurgle furgle", he said, or something like that.

Yes, but less likely to burgle it while the occupants are at home.

The key part of my analogy is "that I knew would burgle it".

The meta-data show the best time to burgle your house or fake your identity online.

It could be a 'common' method of scouting places to burgle among criminals who manage to not get caught.

It might be easier to burgle a house during the day, when the target and the neighbours are more likely to be at work.

Anecdotally, my house was burgled around 3pm and my friends was also burgled whilst at work.

I'd much rather burgle an Australian or English home than one in the US, given how many homes in the US have guns.

If you know a home has guns, aren't you just as likely to burgle it while the occupants are out, probably in order to steal the guns?

Although they could burgle people's houses and extract information that way, it doesn't scale and they certainly couldn't do it to all the people in a country.

If the cost of keeping him out of it exceeds the cost he inflicts by his presence, I'd say we should keep him incarcerated and spend less, not just tell him "OK, burgle all you want".

Someone is unlikely to burgle a house using this technique, but it's a very practical method for determined attackers against otherwise hardened targets.

The simplest counterargument is that if his actions didn't make that content available, what were all the visitors to his site doing?Should a person be able to successfully defend with "What's the problem, I was only giving copies of the vault key to the people who I knew would burgle it. I never handled any of the vault contents myself!

I for one wouldn't immediately go out and murder or burgle anyone, because my reasons for not doing those things are firstly my ethical intuition that such an act is wrong and secondly the fact that people are likely to fight back.