blacklists

GMail may not use public blacklists, but they definitely have IP-based reputations that feed into other blacklists.

So the way to get off from spam blacklists is to send spam mails between two addresses?

I bet they have their own internal ranking system which is far more accurate than the public blacklists.

So we switched to a VoIP service, which we can set up blacklists or whitelists for as we like.

They were buying new blocks of IP addresses to try to evade blacklists.

It seems a lot of blacklists don't bother to make the distinction.

I'm curious to know why you think they'd be any more accurate than public blacklists.

McCarthy's blacklists were justified because of widespread Communist infiltration?

> Basically, create a sort of tech industry predator list People with your blacklists, you never learn...

This is an attempt at preventing employment blacklists.

I always wonder how companies like Mailchimp stay out of Google's blacklists.

The primary limiting factor for most blacklists is not scale, but simply the fact that most of them have no more than a few data sources - most commonly spamtrap data.

How is "a list of bad signatures" different from existing blacklists?

Blacklists are the de facto solution that we implemented because using that list prevented any consensus of any other method of combating spam.