anti-privacy

If so, they can't be trusted not to do something else crazy, like enact this other anti-privacy policy being discussed here.

Being able to circumvent anti-privacy measures is a good skill to have, but actually doing it is ultimately less useful than quitting.

Meanwhile, google add more and more anti-privacy provisions to their terms all the time and don't get anywhere near this amount of coverage.

I think that most people with first-hand experience around child abuse are probably not anti-privacy advocates.

But it lessens with every passing day as Zuck hides an anti-Net Neutrality, anti-competitive and anti-privacy practice by giving it a false PR spin.

The advertising-enabled anti-privacy web that Google has enabled is frankly quite unappealing.

I love Twitter (mattc58) regardless of what it says about my apparent ego and anti-privacy fetishes.

I know more than a few people who were abused as children, but none of them have become think-of-the-children anti-privacy advocates.

The Anti-Privacy feature is probably a big deal to legitimizing the Play Store in the eyes of iOS devs who worry about Android's large piracy rates.

I really dislike the fact that this is totally anti-privacy which is one of the hottest topics in cloud file storage today.

Accept money from anti-privacy advocates, put it in demilitarization researches.

If you're actively anti-privacy, stop calling them private offices.

The original comment refers to the interaction of subcultures as well, namely the "builder" subcultures who can direct their efforts towards pro-privacy or anti-privacy efforts.

But that's entirely because they have to comply with federal law, not because they're "anti-privacy".

In my opinion, all that is happening with these "anti-privacy laws" is that very old spying practices are becoming codified in law.

Of course the anti-privacy crusaders lead with "think of the children!"