anarchist

Ghandi was an anarchist, not sure if that discredits him in your eyes.

The vast majority of them seem to be well-meaning, anarchist or at least hippyish artistic young people.

The socialists who grew up immersed in boomer politics, the anarchist who saw his friends beaten up by the cops...

"Cop: <finally noticing all the anarchist and anti-govt.

It's totally okay to be an atheist today, but we need just one extra little step to be anarchists and it's so, so, so complicated.

Some of these HN discussions would maybe be better served if moved somewhere like that.. and some HN'ers might choose now as a good time to dive into the crypto-anarchist world, or at least dip their toes in the water.

Otherwise, you're just an anarchist, burning the system down and denying any contribution to the people who have committed to a certain lifestyle on the guarantees currently provided by society.

And more regulation isn't helping the "crypto-anarchist" decentralization angle either.

Most especially if you were black or female, but even if you were white and male if you were poor, or a union organizer, or a communist, or an anarchist, or a protester, or a striker, or a member of an unusual religion.

From security's perspective, they are going to be immediately thinking one of: some weird drug lingo/money laundering situation, some weird pyramid scheme, or some cultist or anarchist dealing in imaginary currency.

" I posit that it's better than not bonding at all, but if you really want to dismiss my friendships and suggest the only way to forge lifetime male bonding is to form an underground anarchist militia and make bombs out of soap, I'll take that under consideration.

People of that ilk just consider a different structure to organizing society, or as he puts it "a kind of voluntary socialism, that is, as libertarian socialist or anarcho-syndicalist or communist anarchist, in the tradition of, say, Bakunin and Kropotkin and others.