Ally used in a sentence

Ally in a sentence as a noun

The UK is a EU member, which is so much more than just an ally.

Maybe these "features" really are just random noise.

This leads to a lot of frustration when you have a 20 death ally on your team.

Decades of "we're your ally" "nope just kidding".

But OpenBSD is not a meaningful ally in a contest between you and NSA.

Beyond that, you normally can ignore the small or trivial points.

[2] Side distraction: We can actually, with a little effort visualize a 4-d space.

It will eventually get to you because it is moving perpendicular to it's surface.

Clearly, Turkey is not really a democracy anymore.

"When you actually take the effort to communicate with your team and your team actually **** weaker players the mood in games greatly improves.

And you basically eliminate the tax risks altogether.

You retain virtually complete control of the timing and terms of your future funding choices without needing investor approval to make the choices as you like.

Ally in a sentence as a verb

But if I understand correctly, this only comes out as a result of a power struggle between Erdogan and his former ally, the preacher Fethullah Gülen.

Not that OpenBSD was comically insecure --- it wasn't --- but that its reputation so far outstripped its actually differentiation.

Let's get some socially and technically-informed discussion back in to Australian politics before it gets any more irrelevant.

The US also backed Saddam Hussein against Iran, overthrew a left-wing but democratically elected government in Chile and replaced it with a brutal dictatorship.

SNI operated the world's first commercial vulnerability research team, and had a very close relationship with Theo; we had a full time employee who had essentially led the first OpenBSD security audit.

Austrian Empire was a multicultural nightmare basically think conditions in modern Iraq, no majority and everyone hates everyone and the only thing holding it together is a strong empire.

This, for the record, is an interesting example of the kind of "misaligned incentives" that happen when users demand to receive unlimited value for a fixed payment: by correcting that pricing mistake, we now have regained a political ally.

In such cases, with institutional investors, you may still find yourself arguing about valuation in negotiating caps but the process is nowhere near as involved as it is with a typical equity round and founders with leverage can usually dispense with caps as well.

It sounds conspiratorial, and nobody would explicitly admit this; sometimes, we get to status quo through unintended consequences, but people build their businesses on unintended consequences, and change isn't something they take easily, especially when it impacts their bottom line.

When he says "I love this hard and unyielding part of myself more than any other reward the world has to offer a newly brightened and ingratiating demeanor, and I will bear any costs associated with it," I hear the the constant refrain in the African-American community to "keep it real", where what this really means is "don't range widely.

It also means you create tax risks and complications: if the equity round is too near the time of formation, the $.0001/sh pricing used by founders for their shares may look funny next to the much higher amount per share paid by investors, raising risks that the founders can be deemed to have received their shares at the higher valuation as potentially taxable service income; once you do an equity round, you will need to do 409A valuations in connection with doing option grants and that necessitates getting outside independent appraisals; equity rounds come with strings, including investor preferences, investor protective provisions limiting what you can do as a founder without investor approval, co-sale and first refusal rights favoring investors and concomitantly limiting founders, board seats and/or observer rights for investors, and the like.