age-related

The chance of being able to eliminate nearly all age-related diseases in the foreseeable future is very small.

Do you really think they've been looking at all age-related effects (arthritis is one) of taking a vaccine?

That's a really young age to have any sort of marked age-related cognitive decline.

I think almost everyone is affected by age-related degeneration of their vision at some point or another.

The billions of people suffering from non age-related maladies and mistreatments aren't well served by devoting yet more resources to the health concerns of the wealthiest.

If you eat foods with low amounts of the amino acids methionine and leucine, you could significantly reduce age-related diseases and the risk for certain cancers.

A more likely outcome is that we will find a drug that can treat a certain age-related disease by working on these pathways.

> Age-related disease is simply not an issue for the billions of young people suffering.

Who suffers the most from age-related disease?

The same group that pioneered this approach is now heading down the traditional path of attempts to apply this treatment as a late stage intervention for age-related disease and dysfunction.

Even if you assume that ending age-related disease is the best cause, you also have to estimate the likelihood of them actually being successful and weight your recommendations by that likelihood.

If you want to do better than the SRF at assigning dollars to speeding up progress towards ending age-related disease, you're going to have to spend some years reading research and making connections.

Age-related disease kills ~100,000 people every day, and causes horrible day to day suffering for hundreds of millions of others.

Age-related disease is simply not an issue for the billions of young people suffering.