Stylised used in a sentence

Stylised in a sentence as an adjective

3D printing a bunch of stylised chess pieces? honestly, they're just symbols with a rule set...

It makes me expect lands to be light and seas to be dark, even on a stylised monochrome globe.

But in the UK stylised drawings of child pornography are illegal. That's just silly.

I have an app that offers a flat, stylised look on iOS 6 and a completely native iOS 7 look on iOS 7.

"hamburger menu" refers to a menu which pops out when you click on the 'menu' icon, which looks a bit like a stylised hamburger. => ☰

I wouldn't really call it that stylised so much as obscured, presumably to prevent the bill payer moaning. \nOut of curiosity, when do you call text book image stylised?

I'd love to see a candy envelope being stylised packing animation in the background or off to the side. It could look amazing visually and would explain the concept instantly.

In a stylised securities transaction we have customers, brokers, and an exchange. Customers have choices between brokers.

A game with very stylised graphics will always win over a game with very realistic graphics as far as I'm concerned. If you've got a game with unassuming graphics it's a lot easier to focus on the gameplay.

Apple tried to prevent a supermarket chain here in Australia from using a logo which stylised their "W" as an apple, one that looked nothing like Apple's apple.

[1] If this were more than a quick, stylised analysis I'd construct a covariance matrix or copula to describe the dependency structure. Given the razor thin odds, however, it is unlikely that correlation will help the OP's case too much.

Hmm. From a quick scan through the screenshots, of the 13 apps reviewed only two use a large image of a microphone in their UI and only one of those is a photo-realistic rendition - the other is much more stylised. So what I get from this is that given complete freedom there are a huge variety of possible UIs, and the chances of Samsung and Apple coming up with the same design independently is near zero.

This analysis is stylised, but it remains that even if one takes a 1/4 drop in cash flow from purchase to year 1 and manages to lose 5% of cash flows each year thereafter, the investment will earn a 23% yield assuming abandonment after 7 years.

What we have have is a political system that uses a stylised propaganda framework to propagate and reinforce itself - much as the Church did in the middle ages. Belief in 'markets' as some kind of metaphysical efficient all-but omniscient decision-making entity is central to that, in some segments of the population - just as belief in Church dogma used to be equally pervasive.

The reality is inevitably more complicated than stylised examples: most obviously because wages tend to be directly or indirectly linked to inflation. In general, a person tending to spend virtually all their income within a month of earning it will lose out less than someone who hoards their wealth; if they're due a 2% annual pay rise and the Central Bank is pretty good at keeping inflation within a 2% range they're not going to suffer, particularly not if they can find a decent savings account for the money that isn't paying their monthly bills.