Snoop used in a sentence

Snoop in a sentence as a noun

You're gonna snoop on all my data? Take it ALL and choke on it.

Swisher may be a powerful snoop. She may even be the "best" tech journalist out there.

You may not get the job, but at least youll have been turned down while keeping a strong sense of ethics about you which is more than you can say for companies that would ask to snoop in your private life. I guess this is the best course of action for most people.

It's helping diplomats illegally snoop on our allies. It's helping keep US companies aware of what non-US companies are doing.

It's hosted in Canada, but the US leaned on them hard enough that they ended up backdooring the client to let the feds snoop on the targeted user.

Bzzt, logical fallacy - "either work for free, or snoop around in user's data for monetizable content." Hint: there's a very, very wide spectrum between these extremes.

It could be just me, but this story bothers me a lot more than all the non-stop coverage about NSA. Perhaps I had always expected NSA to snoop on everything on the internet whereas this shows complete breakdown in common sense by the government.

Snoop in a sentence as a verb

I certainly don't want a blob on my wrist endlessly buzzing and tapping away, trying to figure out my heart rate and mood and generally being a bothersome noisy little electronic snoop. But at the same time, I can imagine that the younger crowd wants exactly that.

Your comments clearly indicate that you think "direct access" unambiguously means "access to servers that run GMail that the NSA can snoop on any time they like." But from what I've seen, most comments on HN adopt and acknowledge a more ambiguous definition.

You can say what you like about the Constitution, but my tin foil hat says that the reason you dont have laws like this in North America is because we have the technology and can afford to snoop on Skype, email, and so forth at scale. Ethiopia simply doesnt have the money and/or know-how to monitor VoIP and Email at scale.

Wow. The NSA spent untold billions building advanced tech to snoop others but never bothered to set up proper internal controls for their own systems? Of course this also raises the question, how can they continue to insist that there are reasonable controls in place to prevent abuse when they can't even determine what Snowden accessed, after he collected thousands of documents over a span of years?

Org/wiki/Sybil_attack Then there's "long con" attacks where a group of malicious nodes joins the network and pretends to be friendly for a long period of time, adding a lot of resources and gaining a lot of trust, only to finally use that trust to fragment, DOS, snoop, or otherwise harm the network. Any of these attacks are well within the technical capability of a well-funded nation state.

> But to expect government to accept a situation where there is zero way they can snoop or investigate is asking a lot. I see noone expecting government to accept such a situation, and even flawless information security for your communications does not create such a situation. You are setting up a strawman with this sentence. > What is needed is a rock solid frame work and set of rules that properly limit how the snooping is done.