Kilo used in a sentence

Kilo in a sentence as a noun

Which was, in total, one lemon and a quarter-kilo of flour.

Every kilogram of useful mass you can find on the moon is one less kilo you have to haul from earth.

I think there is pain on both sides of this conversation, at least a couple of kilo-snarks. If it helps someone to become a better person, its beneficial.

So let's see $50 Billion to anybody who can take us to a repeatable $10/kilo to low earth orbit. Or $10 Billion for the first 3D printer able to print an electric car.

So let's see $50 Billion to anybody who can take us to a repeatable $10/kilo to low earth orbit. Or $10 Billion for the first 3D printer able to print an electric car."

The prefixes that we use are, in order from smallest to largest: 'kilo' 'mega' 'giga' 'tera' 'peta'... , and the abbreviations are 'K' 'M' 'G' 'T' 'P' ...

New kilo is lighter than old one, thus making all new measurements bigger in absolute numbers. Besides, can't they recreate a "canonical kilo" with the required measurements?

It is define kilo as a specific number of Silicon-28 atoms, that have a well known mass. The laboratory with that proposal made the most perfect sphere ever, in attempt to allow measurements.

Write multi kilo-word reviews of honest to goodness books with reference to the ideas therein. Really pour yourself into the work -- take as your inspiration Michel de Montaigne's Essais.

The administrator purchased a kilo of *******, and by doing so, gave his home address to the undercover agent. After interrogation, they gained user credentials that even included DPR's private messages.

Effectively, it's like a bladeless fan, but modern researchers have not been able to replicate the reported thrust - lifting 90lb - non-one's been able to lift more than a kilo as far as I'm aware.

SpaceX is working on it, but they're currently around $6k per kilogram [1], with hopes to get to $1100 or less per kg [2]. Cost-to-orbit reduction is not a sexy or scientifically interesting problem to solve, but Nasa needs to put as a top priority. As the parent post stated $100 per kilo means all of their other plans go from being grandiose to realistic.

Looking back, there was far too much emphasis on getting all prefixes and their relationships memorized: micro, milli, centi, deci, hecto, kilo, mega. And virtually no emphasis on developing an intuitive "metric" feel for the common quantities in everyday life.

I can remember reading respected mathematicians approximating the problem-solving power of early computing machines in girl-years and describing machine labor in kilo-girl units.

It isn't that they were any less smart than today, it's just that where they had kilo-X, we have giga-X, if not tera-X or even peta-X. One of my evolutionary computation professors said that he had a deck of cards that he carried from job to job, university to university, running bits of his evolutionary computation experiment on spare cycles, an experiment that runs in fractions of a second on hardware at the time he told the story in 2001. Presumably now it would run in even more fractional fractions of a second.

The scientific community is working on the replacement: Known as the Avogadro Project, the plan is to bring together enough atoms of one substance silicon to make a kilo. Attention has focused on silicon because: - its characteristics are very well understood - a single crystal of the right size can be grown - its atomic structure is extremely uniform - its widespread use in the computer industry means it can be obtained with relative ease at high purity and resonable cost.

Quote Examples using Kilo

Your concern is at the heart of the effort to redefine the kilo. Everyone wants to link it to fundamental constants. The trouble is that the IPK is still more reliable than our measurements of Planck's constant and Avogadro's number. The meter was an artifact until measurements of the speed of light surpassed the prototype. The situation here is the same. If the world ended and all of the distributed artifacts were lost, you could use existing measurements of fundamental constants to redefine the kilo at slightly worse precision.

Anonymous