transmittance

Why does its transmittance data seem to bounce back and forth between 0 and 1?

What's going on here is a discussion about transmission and transmittance.

Window tint levels in NY state are limited to a minimum of 70% light transmittance.

Both wavelengths have better transmittance through fog than visible light so we say those sensors can 'see through' fog.

Blue curves being off says they probably did a poor job on the transmittance of their blue filter material.

What part of the influence of CO2 concentration on the infrared transmittance of the atmosphere are you questioning [0]?

Sunscreening devices, when measured in combination with the original glass, must have a light transmittance value of 25% or more.

I use them exclusively in the oven, where the IR transmittance of the glass is useful, and the uniform surrounding temperature makes the poor thermal conductivity a non-issue.

Then what would you call [purposefully] generating nano sized particles and mixing them in a specific ratio to add to glass to create a colour change effect that is highly sensitive to contaminants?It's not simply chemistry as it's using [apparently] engineered physical effects of light transmittance.

You never write "We poured the mixture" or "We measured the transmittance", but rather "The mixture was poured into a 250ml Erlenmeyer flask" and "Transmittance was measured using a model 500 spectrophotometer with a 580nm filter".The reason, as anyone who has read and followed more than a few "Materials and Methods" sections can tell you, is that this style of writing makes it very easy to skim through and find the relevant bits.