Theorist used in a sentence

Theorist in a sentence as a noun

If you judge Chomsky by his fans, it is easy to dismiss him as a conspiracy theorist. That's not what he's doing.

Nl/~hooft101/theorist. html by a Nobel laureate in physics who is a native speaker of Dutch, makes clear what the key learning task is to be a good physicist: "English is a prerequisite.

Apologies for the conspiracy theorist tone. But yeah, we're just getting started.

For years, you go around trying to raise the alarm, and you're a crazy conspiracy theorist. Then when you finally get conclusive proof - it's old news, everyone knows, you've been saying it for years!

Last month if you went on CNN and claimed that the NSA had free reign to access whatever they wanted, you'd be considered a conspiracy theorist. Now you are at least just considered to be aiding the terrorists.

Whenever I spoke about this to people 10 years ago the reaction was "there's no proof, you're paranoid, you're a conspiracy theorist". Now we have proof the reaction is "so what, everyone knows that, I have nothing to hide".

This is "A nine year old dialog by a loop quantum gravity specialist putting words into the mouth of an imaginary string theorist." That may or may not be worth reading, but I think the context is important.

If you're a theorist, you might prove some theorems. Next you write a toy implementation in Matlab or Python to show that your method actually works, and that you get improvement over previous work for the dataset size you're using.

Not to mention the conspiracy theorist positing that it might have been a woman posting the fake porn pictures. The mental gymnastics some people will perform to avoid facing the obvious truth are amazing.

Another insult against a theorist: "Interesting, I'm from industry and this appears very applicable to some of the work we're doing right now."

Nl/~hooft101/theorist. html lists essential knowledge that everyone should possess who desires to advance theoretical physics, and included in that knowledge is much mathematics.

Some people I've talked about him told they believe he is a conspiracy theorist however maybe I'm naive but most of the things he says make perfect sense to me. I remember watching "Century of the Self" at 21 and having a tiny 'aha' moment about how things work.

Stopping support for a product that uses a certain standard doesn't mean you're against that standard, unless you're a conspiracy theorist. You can argue that they're against certain open standards if you want, but the canceling of Reader isn't actually evidence of that.

The chances they'd all be dismissed as conspiracy theorist crackpots? It's easy to think "If I were in any of their positions, I would've gotten the entire country's attention", but it seems people at every level are determined to be ignorant as long as it's profitable.

David K. Levine is a highly regarded economist and game theorist. Boldwin and Levine state that Watt, like many inventors who obtain patents for inventions that were conceived by several people around the same time, was able to take advantage of the legal system because he was well connected.

I'm not generally a conspiracy theorist, but you have to wonder what we still don't know if this is the extent to which the US is willing to go to get this guy. Not only are they further torpedoing their international image, I would imagine they severely strained their reach with nations like France when it turns out he wasn't on board.

No. In this world, it is true that scientists rarely keep the data secret, more often than not, silly conspiracy theorist views notwithstanding. Business-sponsored science is very often secret, but please don't attempt to paint, as the parent commenter disingenuously attempts to do, that scientists are the root of data secrecy.

If I wanted to be more of a conspiracy theorist about it, I might believe that if this were passed into law, it would be to force companies to maintain readily exportable data about their users, which is only a court order away from being exported to government officials.

There's an only half-joke that academics always want to reduce every field to their own: to an economist everything is analyzable with economic tools, to a sociologist everything is culture, to a physicist everything is physics and its minor epiphenomena, to a philosopher everything is philosophy plus implementation details, to a dynamical systems theorist everything is just instantiations of dynamical systems, etc.