Quantitative used in a sentence

Quantitative in a sentence as an adjective

If they do it, it's quantitative easing. If you do it, it's a mafia.

Note: This tunnel would "cost" china less than one month of the USA's "quantitative easing". For whatever "cost" means to a government that can print its own money.

It's more like what git did with quick access to diffs: a quantitative change can become a qualitative change. Change the cost-benefit of toolsmithing, and you can use it in new ways.

Is this just a case of everyone in the bitcoin market being "unsophisticated" in the quantitative sense? or is there some new form of market micro structure being created here?

But neither guess gives me a good quantitative basis for estimating how much users here differ from the general population.

Most graduates in quantitative disciplines have not taken Econ 101. Most people with economics degrees have taken Econ 101.

I met folks at Hacker School [3] who switched from econ, ME, OR, and other quantitative fields to CS, because you have more freedom to pursue ideas, can do more without being part of a huge team that makes you a tiny cog in a giant machine. And, by the way, it pays twice as well.

There's a big difference between 1% and 10%, both qualitative and quantitative. For example: Smaller numbers are closer to the noise level, and therefore more subject to fluctuation.

I appreciate that symbols can be an odd way to represent every day quantitative problems, but I have never had a problem with it. Sure, some people do, but this guy seems really royally pissed off at ordinary mathematics.

There is truly nothing worse than reading something by someone who has no education in comprehending quantitative data try to critique it. However, I do agree with his statement on the climate control.

I've said this before and I'll say it again; using Compete for quantitative traffic comparisons is flawed, particularly with social sites that utilize embeddable content. Their data has been proven wrong countless times.

Since we need to weigh the harm caused by the lack of things that never existed against the benefits brought by things that do, it's probably impossible to do a quantitative analysis that is fair to both sides. However, I and many others oppose patents on deontological grounds.

I'm not basing this on any scientific or quantitative information at all, just my own personal experiences from online dating from 2004-2008, the end of which was when I met my now-fiancee. The "sausagefest syndrome" is inherently why so many online dating sites suck.