pro-russia

There is a reason you see more pro-China pieces than pro-Russia, pro-Syria, pro-Cuba, or pro-Saudi pieces for example.

Almost 50% of the country is pro-russia.

They didn't speak Russian at all, so most definitely not from the east or other pro-russia kind of Ukrainians.

Furthermore, 40.8% of Donetsk citizens support rallies for Ukraine's unity, while 26.5% support rallies which are pro-Russia And so on.

Just because people in parliment are of russian descent does not make them pro-russia either.

Speaking Russian language or being ethnic Russian is not same as being pro-Russia politically.

He can travel overland to any country that is pro-Russia and protected by Russia.

I have yet to read a single article from Cпільне that is pro-Russia in even the slightest way.

I find what Putin is doing to be deplorable, and the pro-Russia astroturfing is often blatantly obvious.

But even the pro-Russia people don't necessarily think Ukraine should join Russia, almost everyone want's the corruption to stop, as you have pointed out.

>There is a reason you see more pro-China pieces than pro-Russia, pro-Syria, pro-Cuba, or pro-Saudi pieces for example.

>- Crimea is an autonomy, but even now russians stimulated by pro-Russia politicians say that they want Ukraine to be a federation.

Being pro-nagios is like being pro-Russia, pro-North Korea, and pro-Rap Genius while arguing "but at least we know how bad they are and can keep them in line."

I find it interesting that they use a "villain" troll as a virtual strawman to knock down -- I feel like that adds a layer of subtlety that wouldn't really exist with solely the pro-Russia content.

But we're discussing the case where pro-Russia thug president Yanukovitch, after messing up very badly with very open and explicit Russian support, runs away to Russia, and immediately Russia sends their military into Ukrainian territory - and it's US that is "meddling" and is to blame for the situation?