overvaluation

The very definition of a bubble is a positive feedback loop of overvaluation.

Twitter was hyped by the media since it's used by the media, which led to its overvaluation.

Ie: does a 100% overvaluation with A16Z lead to a greater than 100% company growth compared with other investors?

Any guesses on whether that's a sign of a market that's in the early stages of overvaluation?

There may be overvaluation, especially at later stages, but the investments being made assume there is.

This looks like a correction of a ridiculous overvaluation spike to me.

The A$ has certainly improved in the last year, but we went through a sustained period of the massive overvaluation.

I see them as merely a correlation of the overvaluation of tech companies, not a continuation of the bubble cycle.

Fragility of a market + overvaluation and overspeculation implies a bubble.

Does this concentration of talent make up for a company's overvaluation?

There are significant isolated pockets of extreme overvaluation in tech.

If an outside investor buys stock, of course, under/overvaluation matters.

So, they conclude that there is no longer "exceptional overvaluation" of the Swiss franc that justified the minimum exchange rate.

He "made" his fortune by selling a company at a spectacular overvaluation.

> “There’s definitely some craziness and people overpaying” > “I think we’re in a period of overvaluation and frothiness” > "A bunch of bad decisions don’t necessarily mean we are in a bubble.” So its just unrealistic valuations and a frothy investment market leading to bad investing decisions.

Overvaluation is fine if they have put in place protections for their capital, like liquidation preferences and anti-dilution clauses for down rounds.