non-ionizing

Although much of the ultraviolet spectrum is non-ionizing, some of it is not, and a small portion of the heat from the sun is ionizing radiation.

Another possible cause is the almost global increase in exposure to non-ionizing radiation from the ubiquity of wireless devices.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer have stated that non-ionizing radiation could cause cancer in humans.

However, microwave radiation -- the 2.4 ghz part of the electromagnetic spectrum -- is pretty safely in the non-ionizing range.

Although this also covers non-ionizing radiation, this is a very different frequency range.

Non-Ionizing radiation means exactly that.

Don't confuse ionizing radiation as from Fukushima, with non-ionizing radiation, as from microwaves.

Yes RF is non-ionizing, but research linking it to cancer is generally inconclusive.

Most importantly, millimeter waves are non-ionizing and therefore safe, unlike X-rays.

But this reflexive bleating about non-ionizing radiation needs to stop.

Scientists shy away from saying with absolute certainty that a particular wavelength is non-ionizing, because they have to take into account other factors, like total power involved.

It's just a lot of concentrated non-ionizing radiation.

Keep in mind that the "radiation" from cell phones is non-ionizing -- very different.

If your immediate response is something about "non-ionizing" then you know nothing about the many animal experiments that demonstrate behavior and biological effects from magnetic fields and EM exposure.

> Seems it might be a bit hasty to just say "well it's non-ionizing radiation, so one is ignorant to fear it" That would be nice if anyone was saying that.

Non-ionizing radiation doesn't damage DNA, unless you have so much of it that it overheats or something.

Non-ionizing radiation inducing currents would not break bonds--it would just interfere with repairing bonds that were broken by some other mechanism.

Non-ionizing radiation can still be harmful.