lawless

When police is more like bandits and courts are lawless?

Now, your speech must be likely to cause "imminent lawless action".

I think a lot of people romanticize things like Bitcoin as being part of a world that's lawless relative to the real one.

> smsm42: You make it sound as "sharing economy" is inherently lawless idea, which it is not.

Again though, interpretation of what speech will lead to "imminent lawless action" is not defined so this is a poor test as well.

This may sound horrible and racist but when I think of China and tech I think cheap, hacky, non-reliable, lawless, and poorly done.

Lott is also the guy who predicted that Australia would become a lawless wild west with stricter gun laws in place after the Port Arthur massacre.

And now that you mention it, all those lobbyists headquartered up and down K Street represent a far more lawless situation that anything I know of online.

I crunched the numbers to see how that would translate to our 'lawless', 'gunless' country, where criminals 'have free reign', and it would mean we would have 15k deaths because we don't do concealed gun laws.

Within this zone are several city-states and otherwise large stretches of lawless territory connected, but not held together, by a network of smugglers and local warlords.

Clearly in some cases peaceful criticism of violent religious practices, as well as harmless cartoons that are not even disparaging have lead to imminent lawless action.

Exit means you leave and go somewhere else, and was common in early political eras when most civilizations were small and surrounded by plenty of nomadic/lawless regions to retreat to.

The only thing keeping a lawless government from pulling stunts like this is the fear of citizen revolt, and even then they generally proceed if the projected revolution strength is sufficiently weak.

A more reasonable view would be to note that those who engage in lawless action should be responsible for their own actions, regardless of whatever speech or opinions they claim made them engage in criminal behavior.

I can't recall any lawless institution that all of the sudden became lawful of its own accord:> "NSA does not have a statutory charter; its operational responsibilities are set forth exclusively in executive directives first issued in the 1950s.

Translated into plain English:"proprietary business information" means "this nation's copyright and patent systems are horribly and possibly irrevocably broken and many government departments are so unaccountable they feel so entitled and lawless they care more about making their jobs easy than serving the people paying their salaries.