Largess used in a sentence

Largess in a sentence as a noun

The largess and crudness drowns out our finer points.

I'm guessing Boeing and Lockheed would be the recipients of that largess.

The largess of the GNU C compiler is the very definition of a black box.

"To wit, the discovered it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury.

Funny how people always use this example as the poor voting themselves largess out of the treasury.

The irresponsible largess in the current government pension system needs to come to an end.

Her complaint is that her personal wealth and financial success is largely due to largess granted her by her family's wealth.

It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury.

Yes there are differences in the state, but as a whole it is way more suited to be self sustaining than a lot of states sucking on the Federal largess.

"At some point you have to build a real business, generate real profits, sustain the company without the largess of investor’s capital, and start producing value the old fashioned way. "Exactly.

" Gendered language aside, the idea of the founders was clearly that rights derive from one's innate humanity, and do not derive from government largess.

You think because suburbanites pay some taxes, they're paying their own way?Suburbs would depopulate if we urbanites withheld our largess.

Over on NPR Planet Money, there was an episode that suggested that looking at how much money airlines have lost, cheap flights are a function of shareholder largess.

It condemns open source to be the provence of academics, the unemployed, those able to snatch free time away from their friends and familier, or those working at the largess of their corporate employers.

But on the day I beg for succor, I hope I have the good fortune so to do from someone who respects me highly enough to let me work for what I need, instead of offering mere unearned largess by means of which to enhance his own opinion of himself at the cost of my humiliation.

In the summary, “At some point you have to build a real business, generate real profits, sustain the company without the largess of investor’s capital,” Wilson said, “and start producing value the old fashioned way.”I do believe a significantly higher proportion of companies today are doing exactly that, and are quite focused on it, whereas they were not in 1999.

If you work in an industry where this isn't true, but depends on the largess/spending of people who work in industries where this is true, are you still in a largely zero-sum waste of time job?More simply, how many levels deep do you carry this analysis?Also, can you guesstimate how much of the income generated in the US is not derived from zero-sum waste of time jobs/products when you carry the analysis at least 2 levels deep?