iphones

The service is bad because the iPhones use crappy parts, which is also why the service sucks for non-iPhone smartphones?

If there are no suspicious messages arriving on iphones, that suggests it may not be being widely exploited.

Does anyone who isn't being paid money by AT&T actually think their network problems are because iPhones are poorly made?

Presumably anyone exploiting this would end up sending such messages to many iphones as well, where they could not delete themselves.

It works with original, 3G, and 3gs iPhones (although it is faster on 3gs).

Kind of like how Occupy Wallstreet drank Coca Cola and brought iPhones to protests.

I used to use MacBooks and iPhones, basically because the iPhone was so far ahead that it wan't even funny.

I occasionally get picture or video messages from iPhones on my Android phone which just crash the default Messaging app.

I'm wondering how users on mobile browsers which aren't iPhones would react to that interface...?

They still have TV, a culture of entertainment, Facebook, and iPhones.

Android is advancing much faster than iPhones on the tech side.

I pointed it out since the Op mentioned high society-economic classes buy iPhones.

It was that "one-two punch" that took out Blackberry: * iPhones were cool.

I agree about the attempts to mimic "cool" animations from iphones - that's just cheap.

"In fact, at the beginning they used to say that the iPhones were really their property, since Apple gave every employee a free iPhone," he points out.