Innovation used in a sentence

Innovation in a sentence as a noun

Gone are the days of "**** innovation", two of Zynga's most recent releases are the best they've ever built.

We have people who have been working their asses off since age 4, are now in their 20s and 30s, and want to take part in technical innovation.

They entered the phone market when capacitive touchscreens were cheap/large enough - their real innovation was on the software side.

Whatever else this system does, it hardly promotes true innovation.

The internet attracts so much innovation in large part because it's very open to innovation.

"These are not patents on innovation, theyre patents on simple ideas and features that you didnt even think of first but you were the first to patent.

It should destroy them if they are not being actively used - but a company trying to protect its innovations in not something that I'm against.

The continuous attempts to reframe Craigslist's actions as an attempt to stifle innovation seem almost surreal.

It's an homage and the Swiss will be honoured that their famous clock has been elevated to the high-art status of Apple design and innovation.

Mobiles skwrking, mobiles chirping, take the money and run, take the money and run, take the money...Is it any wonder that this isn't producing innovation?

From this I get the distinct impression he really believed Microsoft wasn't doing anything wrong and things like bundling a browser with the OS were just "innovations";2. Microsoft became too hierarchical combined with more B and C managers.

> He noted that during a time of growing litigation in the smartphone industry, "innovation continues at an absolutely breakneck pace.

The tone in this article is unbelievable.>The case raises questions over whether Craigslist is stifling innovation or simply protecting its dataThere is no question.

If you had a startup and a patentable innovation - it would be ridiculous to assume that you would be willing to forgo millions/billions in revenue for some abstract concept of "a greater good".

Breadth -- connecting disparate ideas -- is almost invariably what's needed for groundbreaking innovation.

The Embrace/Extend/Extinguish methodology which was created under Gates is something that anyone working in infrastructure is going to be fighting for the next 30 years, and it's holding innovation back.

Small companies that were picking the Internet as a delivery platform and using open-source/multi-platform technologies were on the forefront of innovation.

Steve did not contribute any original ideas or any important technological innovations.

The problem with modern software patents is that too many are too easily granted over trivial "innovations" and this has given vast incentives to those who would package them into shakedown licensing ventures and thereby gum things up for true innovators.

According to your article you sit back and say "oh thats totally ok because thats innovation and I'm happy that everyone has copied me and destroyed my advantage".The problems with the patent industry are patents abused by companies who have absolutely no interest in developing them but rather trolling them to simply extract money from other companies.