explosions

What sort of signals do (human scale) nuclear explosions give off that are detectable from light-years away?

The victims of the explosions resulting from the gross negligence, yes, but not the negligent, superstitious idiots.

My brother-in-law was running the Marathon that day, he finished about 30 minutes before the explosions.

Underground nuclear explosions are fairly well contained; done at the depth required to deal with a fault, they'd probably be unnoticeable.

The normal control mechanisms are suppressed, leading to bigger explosions when things go really wrong...

The problem is that San Francisco is/was at the epicenter of two cultural explosions (the hippies and the hackers, to put it bluntly), and they kind of clash just a little bit.

They're caused by earthquakes (or volcanic eruptions, nuclear explosions, or other literally earth-shaking events).

The next century was about getting the temperatures and pressures up without boiler explosions.

Like a 10% chance of explosions in an unmanned flight and a 2% chance of explosion in a manned flight chance hard.

I had no idea there had been any nuclear explosions above the 100km line, let alone above ISS's orbit.

Basically, it failed because it couldn't be controlled anymore, no explosions involved.

Dust explosions are like a fuel-air bomb in that the energy yield per pound is greatly improved by the use of oxidizer from the air.

Nucleosynthesis of heavier materials in supernova explosions and neutron star mergers are two cases of problems that I guess are used for "publicly" validating dark codes.

From an earlier article of the author's that he cites: > Tell students that the fossil record often lacks transitional forms and that there are "explosions" of new life forms, a pattern of radiations that challenges Darwinian evolutionary theory.