enjoining

Was perfectly fine and not worth enjoining until a specific case came up. This is just lawless.

Do you think you could get an injunction enjoining me from engaging in my contract law Q&A business? Again, I think that would be highly unlikely.

The Islamic attitude to this can be found by googling "enjoining what is good and forbidding what is evil". And it very much disagrees with that statement.

There was zero interest in enjoining the effort at all; it expected, without involving.

Any time someone says “we must protect free speech by legally enjoining the following people from speaking,” I am suspicious.

If they succeed in enjoining everyone else's smartphones, then yes, they are a monopolist, and should be held to the same standards that Microsoft was held to.

The court is enjoining their method of influencing public debate - that they were/are preventing what you say from being published based on its content. Prohibiting unlawful orders is not an abridgment of an authority’s “free speech”.

> Any time someone says “we must protect free speech by legally enjoining the following people from speaking,” I am suspicious. The purpose of their speech is to remove the ability for others to access platforms.

All three Bohras have consented to the entry of final judgments permanently enjoining them from further violations of the charged provisions, and ordering them to pay total disgorgement of $1,428,094, total prejudgment interest of $118,406, and total penalties of $1,106,399. They've admitted guilt & culpability.

It was only recently that Greece stopped openly calling for enosis, enjoining Cypriots to overthrow their own government if necessary. They've been quieter about that crap over the last couple of decades, but Greece still clings to the territorial dispute to justify its overgrown military.

The 120 is enough because the statutory damages for just those 120 works could be a staggering amount that would bankrupt IA. The complaint [0] also asks for an injunction enjoining IA from any further infringement of "any of the respective copyrights owned or exclusively controlled, in whole or in part, by Plaintiffs, whether now in existence or hereinafter created." [0] at 51.

Meanwhile, the harm done to competition by granting them a 20-year monopoly on the basic UI paradigm is easily estimable in the trillions of dollars, if they succeed in enjoining Samsung and other manufacturers.

Here's the meat: "Accordingly, a nationwide injunction shall issue enjoining Apple from prohibiting developers to include in their: Apps and their metadata buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms, in addition to IAP. Nor may Apple prohibit developers from: Communicating with customers through points of contact obtained voluntarily from customers through account registration within the app." And it applies to all apps, not just games

Or how about the fact that >” All three Bohras have consented to the entry of final judgments permanently enjoining them from further violations of the charged provisions, and ordering them to pay total disgorgement of $1,428,094, total prejudgment interest of $118,406, and total penalties of $1,106,399.” It isn’t alleged.

But here's the judge's description in the ruling: > a nationwide injunction shall issue enjoining Apple from prohibiting developers to include in their Apps and their metadata buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms, in addition to IAP Obviously this would seem to imply that developers are allowed to accept payment from alternative systems to unlock digital content in apps. But it doesn't explicitly say that.