engrams

But the difference is, you have your somewhat reliable memory engrams, whereas Bing Chat has a very eloquent language model.

While engrams are stored locally, the value is in the Hypervisor that mediates agent access to that data based on the current task's context.

The context is the percept, the model is engrams.

It's not clear to me that the engrams you imagine wouldn't just be a symbolic language under another name.

Sensory pathways in the brain must reinforce engrams more effectively than thought patterns.

Most of the well defined theories propose some kinds of neural engrams.

Here's the answer: I went to David Miscavige and he fixed my DC-10 engrams!

Speaking of which, the neuroscientists figured out how engrams work.

You own the engrams; you own the audits.

The underlying engrams or weights need to dynamically adapt and update based on a stable learning paradigm, and we just don't have that yet.

Is this chip imprinted with engrams from Daystrom?

Or maybe it contains not physically embodied life, but isolated engrams and memes styled after Boltzmann brains, something analogous to crystal structures (which self-proliferate/grow) but with more complexity.

But "fun" (memorable experiences) is what creates memory engrams, so a culture of misery is particularly damaging to teaching ad learning.

Not being able to recall long term memories does not mean that those memory traces/engrams are not embedded somewhere permanently in synaptic circuits and being used for processing in ways other than “mere” recall.

Not a huge fan of the idea of "programming" another person with engrams and random stuff in the environment, to like, die, but it's more plausible than telekinesis!

I don't understand "ANN engrams" anyway.