comparability

It's going to be even harder to do comparability testing now.

Sounds to me like someone that was implementing very early on without great reasons and them kept for backwards comparability.

It took a major effort to get to shippable performance, web comparability, standards compliance, and quality.

And if one supplier is far superior to the others, then the comparability == competition between suppliers lessens, and so does Apple's bargaining power.

My MBP-toting coworkers have to connect and disconnect all that when they pick up their computer; I press the big undock button and it all stays where I left it, and reconnects when I put it back on the desk.- Accessory comparability.

But competition is an inevitable consequence of comparability.

Because eqaulity would mean men == women.\nSo the rights shouldn't be equal but comparable, because mixed soccer leagues would be unfair.\nIt went then on in a discussion if the idea of comparability isn't maybe patriarchic because in studying performance between gender there has been no significant statistical difference etc.