Antibody used in a sentence

Antibody in a sentence as a noun

But from elsewhere on the page, it says that the project isn't working on an antibody approach.

[1] In case a "goat antibody" sounds weird to you, it's a common thing in molecular biology.

Or is this merely an imaging method that will have to be conjugated to, say a cancer-marker antibody?

I once tested positive for HIV with the basic antibody test you mention - a pretty stunning result in view of my lifestyle.

To clarify, the modified HIV virus in this case was used as a vector to deliver an antibody specific to the cancer onto a T-cell.

For example, $50k can get you a basic antibody garage biology operation going...Depending on what you want to do, it can be way less than that.

The landscape is highly political, and most bodies are focused on creating a neutralizing antibody vaccine.

This ups the amount of cells with that particular antibody, increasing the probability that the antigen will be targeted.

I think they mean they train the immune system by creating an antigen, not an antibody, that mimics or is identical to the nonmutating antigen on the virus.

Well, one of the best cell-level examples I can think of is somatic hypermutation, the mechanism by which your immune system refines a good antibody into an excellent one.

After optimization with the Western Blot assay, the antibody to human mesothelin was dispersed with single walled carbon nanotubes.

I think it's worth pointing out that while this is great tech, it's still relying on antibody detection, and the incubation period between infection and antibody production can be anywhere from 6 weeks to 6 months.

However, the law is very clear, and under the current statutes and regulations, Plaintiff's physician may not administer the goat neutralizing antibody drug absent prior approval of the FDA.

For example, $50k can get you a basic antibody garage biology operation going, without cutting corners absolutely everywhere.

Briefly, your body starts out with the B-cell that produces the good antibody, and randomly mutates the critical regions of the antibody gene, generating a large population of B-cells that each produce slightly different antibodies.

How about that!So given all this, how likely is it that the antibody they created blocks CD47 in cancer cells and only cancer cells but of course all types cancer cells, as the article claims?Why don't journalists think/care about the consequences of tabloidizing cancer?