Tendentious used in a sentence

Tendentious in a sentence as an adjective

But it's tendentious and moralizing all the same.

I won't even get into the rest of the tendentious assumptions; that one's enough.

".That article is misleading and tendentious in many ways.

How many tendentious assumptions can we bake into one sentence?

Yeah - maybe sleep deprivation really is a dark blight on the tech industry, but this article is so tendentious!

HN would be more tendentious and have more kibitzing about titles than it does now. Those effects would be compounded everywhere else.

"Gotta love the NYTimes for the tendentious moralizing.

If you want to have a good-faith debate, you should avoid tendentious re-writes of your interlocutor's arguments.

Without any pretense of net neutrality whatsoever..." It should be obvious that that is far too tendentious for HN. We're looking for pieces without blatant spin.

However, it is a tendentious benefit for the consumer, especially as the cars become more common, to have spare parts easily ordered or at hand.

Cold Fusion is a dormant field for an excellent reason, and the tendentious tone of the article -- that it's all a conspiracy against a legitimate field -- contradicts the facts.

Generally, I don't favor definitions that pack in tendentious assumptions for political purposes.

Given that it's a very accurate description for the recent history of mankind from about the mid-19th century until the present I think it's rather tendentious to label it as "hopeless" let alone "utopian".

The tendentious language of the submission should be enough to alert readers that this is basically a press release, not a scholarly article about the various early texts from various places and times that mention claims about Jesus.

Their inflationary calculations are very tendentious and ignore substitution effects.

However individual articles can often come off as tendentious - sources are not required and arguments are often implicitly based on a worldview that is expected to be known to regular readers, whether or not it is agreed with.

With that in mind, I'll mention that the source kindly submitted here, the Wikipediocracy site, is a haven for critics of Wikipedia of all kinds, including people who were site-banned from Wikipedia for tendentious pro-**** edits[1] and a variety of other people that no professional editor would ever allow to edit an important reference resource.