Reimburse used in a sentence

Reimburse in a sentence as a verb

* We reimburse tuition for classes at MIT.

Now the burden is on me to convince the bank to reimburse me.

They wont reimburse her for damages, they say, and they do not insure against losses.

Then whatever they intended to reimburse the money fell through.

If you can't afford that, write up how this advice actually worked out for you in a blog post and I'll reimburse you.

We can probably find a way to match what you're making now if we go ahead and just reimburse you for the movers.

Extra, and you reimburse costs as per your company's usual travel policy.

Intel paid $10M into a pool to reimburse customers who purchased the Intel compiler.

I know that several major exchanges have already dipped into their own coffers to reimburse their users.

In lieu of cash, I would be happy to pay the relo out of pocket and then submit the invoice from United for reimbursement.

LG agreed in writing to reimburse shipping prior to me sending it, but now want to change the terms & added an NDA and are illegally withholding payment[1] of their debt.

You must also file any police reports and provide any supporting affidavits and testimony we reasonably request.\nIf\nyou do not comply with the requirements above, we are not required to reimburse you for any claimed loss, and you cannot bring any legal claim against us in any way related to the item or errors.

You must also file any police reports and provide any supporting affidavits and testimony we reasonably request.\nIf you do not comply with the requirements above, we are not required to reimburse you for any claimed loss, and you cannot bring any legal claim against us in any way related to the item or errors.

For now I'd agree with anyone that says it's their fault for driving it, because that's my insurance's stance and that's the stance that gets me reimbursed for my vehicle, but I can't help but see how if they wanted to fix the initial problem of poor maintenance and no insurance, then they'd need money, so they'd need to drive to work...But it gets worse.

" The court concluded that the obligation to make full restitution was based on an implied promise "on the part of the United States to reimburse the owner for the use of the steamboats and for his own services and expenses, and for the services of the crews during the period the steamboats were employed in transporting government freight pursuant to those orders.