Apprehended used in a sentence

Apprehended in a sentence as an adjective

And that in less than a week, those responsible were killed or apprehended. Now, I'm not pushing for a surveillance state at all.

Why should someone consent to being apprehended if they are protesting the same laws that they are breaking?

Had the man been outside his house earlier in the day, and seen the cover of his boat, its all but likely the suspect could have been apprehended 8-12 hours earlier.

I know this because he hasn't been apprehended yet. How am I doing at creating baseless conspiracy theories based on circumstantial evidence?

> By contrast, when the Lindbergh baby was kidnapped in March 1932, it made national headlines for years -- years -- until the perpetrator was apprehended, tried, and executed in 1936. It's the story of one family, one child, one ******.

He was also a fugitive: he fled the country and hid in Pakistan; he was apprehended trying to return to the US. That could not have helped his sentence. Of course, that detail is the lede of most of the stories I found about Naveed Sheikh when I saw this on HN, but nowhere to be found in this story.

Do you think that there would be more prisoners in Africa if all of the rapists and murderers were somehow instantly apprehended tried and convicted? This article making the USA look like it has the most criminals is a bit misleading.

Earlier I was reading through the Twitter account of the now apprehended suspect and what is most striking is just how normal he is. Every one of his tweets could have been attributed to a completely normal teenager, he couldn't be more generic.

Giving up many of our constitutional rights would also result in more criminals being apprehended, but few of us would do that, because we understand the importance of these rights for our system of government. Why is this any different?

My neighbors and I are confident that a truly dangerous criminal will be apprehended and kept out of society if need be. Young people who fool around with illegal ***** will be diverted to drug treatment programs, but are exceedingly unlikely to face prison time here.

Civil disobedience: I will publicly defy your rules with every intention of being apprehended. My defiance is political- it achieves nothing by itself, and must be public.

Wouldn't it be reasonable to expect that once the feds had apprehended the admin, that the feds might be impersonating a hitman for said admin? It is after all widely insinuated, among certain crowds, that any hitman you hire on the internet is always a fed.

Rerunning this footage certainly added to the drama factor but from a news perspective it actually had negative value since it led people into possibly thinking the second suspect had been apprehended and it also led people to believe that man was in some ways connected to the bombings though he was not. It was just shameful.

"""Imagine if there were an alternate dystopian reality where law enforcement was 100% effective, such that any potential law offenders knew they would be immediately identified, apprehended, and jailed. If perfect law enforcement had been a reality in MN, CO, and WA since their founding in the 1850s, it seems quite unlikely that these recent changes would have ever come to pass.

Despite all the valid criticism one can levy against any system of criminal justice, it's an important pillar of our society that when a crime has occurred, no matter how heinous or vile, the suspected perpetrators are apprehended, and evidence must be produced against them before punishment is meted out. We don't just take them out back and shoot them in the head, no matter how obvious we imagine their guilt to be.

While documenting the participants by any means, so they can be individually & quietly apprehended & prosecuted later. Cell phone metadata, face recognition from video recordings, license plates, etc - all can be applied to identify who was involved, accusing them of all sorts of crimes just for being present if not for particular documented transgressions.

Secondly, he'd need for that flight to actually arrive at a location where he will not be apprehended and handed over to US authorities. Russian asylum will alleviate both issues: It gives him easier access to commercial flights, and it makes it politically far more difficult for those European states that for example were willing to prevent Morales' plane access on a mere rumour he was aboard to justify forcing down a plane he is on.

It's very easy to think of cases where it would be illogical to presume the 6th Amendment shielded assets for use in legal defenses; for instance: the accused has robbed a bank of several hundred thousand dollars, and, having been apprehended, now insists the funds be transferred to the best criminal defense lawyer in the state. Nevertheless: it's been the law of the land for over 20 years that you can't run a massive criminal conspiracy and expect to have all its proceeds available to you in the ensuing criminal trial.